CALIT2 Igniting Technology Program: California Electrification
Description Come hear partner Michael Guiliana speak and moderate the CALIT2 Igniting Technology Program on California Electrification. CALIT2's semi-annual Igniting Technology program will feature...
View ArticleENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE CORP. v. SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO.
Federal Circuit Summary Before Newman, Hughes, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.Summary: Reasonable royalty patent damages cannot include...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Clarity and Progress at the USPTO: The USPTO Publishes Revised Guidance on...
Short SummaryOn Monday, January 7, 2019, a revised guidance for subject matter eligibility (USPTO Section 101 Revised Guidance) will take effect at the USPTO. With the newly revised guidance, the USPTO...
View ArticleClik here to view.
New 101 Guidance from USPTO – What Does It Change?
On January 4th, the USPTO announced revised guidance for subject matter eligibility (Section 101 Revised Guidance) and stated it would take effect when published on Monday, January 7, 2019.The guidance...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Yi-ju Chen, Ph.D.
Attorney User Yiju.Chen@knobbe.comEducation PhysicsCalifornia Institute of Technology 2015 Ph.D.PhysicsNational Taiwan University 2008 B.S.Electrical EngineeringNational Taiwan University 2008...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Partner Mauricio Uribe was quoted in, "Computer Patents To Get Closer Look...
Partner Mauricio Uribe was quoted in, "Computer Patents To Get Closer Look With USPTO Guidance," an article published by Law360.com.Excerpt: The guidance issued Friday was overshadowed by a second memo...
View ArticleDUNCAN PARKING TECHNOLOGIES v. IPS GROUP, INC.
Federal Circuit Summary Before Lourie, Dyk and Taranto. Consolidated Appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the Southern District of California.Summary: A person is a joint inventor of the...
View ArticleCONTINENTAL CIRCUITS LLC v. INTEL CORPORATION
Federal Circuit SummariesBefore Lourie, Linn, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.Summary: Reading a process limitation into a product claim is...
View ArticleCENTRAK, INC. v. SONITOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Federal Circuit Summary Before Reyna, Taranto, and Chen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.Summary: Where the complexity and predictability of a claimed...
View ArticleUNIV OF FL. RES. FOUND., INC. V. GEN. ELEC. CO. ET AL.
Federal Circuit Summary Before Prost, Moore, and Wallach. Appeal from the Northern District of Florida.Summary: When a state entity sues for patent infringement, it waives sovereign immunity as to all...
View ArticlePERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. APPLE, INC.
Federal Circuit Summary Before Moore, Taranto, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.Summary: The mere fact that a certain thing may result from a given set of circumstances is not...
View ArticleARCTIC CAT INC. v. GEP POWER PRODUCTS, INC.
Federal Circuit Summary Before Prost, Reyna, Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.Summary: Where the preamble of a claim merely identifies an intended use and does not impose a...
View ArticleCHARGEPOINT, INC. v. SEMACONNECT, INC.
Before Prost, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.Summary: An abstract idea cannot be used to supply an inventive concept that renders a claim...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Show Wang
Attorney User show.wang@knobbe.comEducation New York University School of Law 2014 J.D.Biomedical EngineeringDuke University 2009 B.S.E.EconomicsDuke University 2009 B.S.Telephone 212-849-3000Office...
View ArticleOMEGA PATENTS, LLC v. CALAMP CORP.
Before Prost, Dyk, and Wallach. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.Summary: Asserting the district court’s claim construction prevented consideration of...
View ArticleATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC v. IANCU
Before Newman, O’Malley, and Wallach. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.Summary: Diligence requires “reasonably continuous diligence” and is not negated if the inventor works on...
View ArticleLG Willfully Infringed Patent Covering “Plug & Play” Standard in Televisions
A New Jersey jury awarded Mondis $45 million in patent damages, based on LG’s sales of infringing televisions that support the “Plug & Play” standard. The “Plug & Play” standard was...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Knobbe Martens Obtains Clean Sweep Of Six IPR Denials
Knobbe Martens, one of the leading intellectual property and technology law firms in the United States, has achieved a clean sweep of six Inter Partes Review (IPR) denials on behalf of its client,...
View Article