Clik here to view.
Nexus Analysis May Be Based on Novel Combination of Known Elements Considered...
HENNY PENNY CORPORATION v. FRYMASTER LLCBefore Lourie, Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office.Summary: With respect to secondary considerations of nonobviousness,...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Amended Complaint May Relate Back to Original Complaint Despite Asserting...
ANZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. MUSHKIN, INC.Before Prost, Newman, and Bryson. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.Summary: Patent infringement claims in an amended...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Partner Bridget Smith was quoted in "Uniclass Didn’t Infringe Computer System...
Partner Bridget Smith was quoted in "Uniclass Didn’t Infringe Computer System Patents, Court Says (1)," an article published by Bloomberg Law.Excerpt: Substantial evidence supported a jury’s nding that...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Plausible and Specific Factual Allegations That Aspects of a Claim Are...
CELLSPIN SOFT, INC. V. FITBIT, INC. ET AL.Before Lourie, O’Malley, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.Summary: While not all factual...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Patent Proposal Could Help EEs | EE Times
Partner Mauricio Uribe authored "Patent Proposal Could Help EEs," which was published on the EE Times website. Excerpt: The U.S. Congress is considering legislation on what is eligible for a patent,...
View ArticleOne-Year Clock for Filing IPR Petition Applies to Litigants and Parties That...
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC v. SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTSBefore Prost, Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.Summary: An IPR is time-barred under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) if, at the time...
View ArticleThe More Complex the Harder to Show Obvious
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. v. ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLCBefore Moore, Reyna, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.Summary: If the technology is complex, a party may be required to...
View ArticleRule 19 Joinder Provisions Are Not Optional
LONE STAR SILICON INNOVATIONS v. NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATIONBefore O’Malley, Reyna, Chen. Appeal from the Northern District of California.Summary: When a patent assignee does not acquire all...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Kendrick S. Hsu
Attorney User kendrick.hsu@knobbe.comEducation Georgetown University Law Center 2018 J.D.Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Southern California 2008 M.S.Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of...
View ArticleFederal Circuit Explores the Sham Affidavit Doctrine
QUEST INTEGRITY USA, LLC v. COKEBUSTERS USA INC.Before Dyk, Taranto, and Hughes. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.Summary: An affidavit should not be dismissed as a...
View ArticleFederal Circuit Appeal Dismissed Where Party Appealing PTAB Decision Lacked...
AVX CORPORATION V. PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC.Before Newman, O’Malley, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent and Trial Appeal Board.Summary: Appellants from an IPR decision to the Federal Circuit must have...
View Article2019 OCTANe Technology Innovation Forum
Description Join us at the OCTANe Technology Innovation Forum from May 13-14 in Newport Beach California. This year's event will focus on the evolution of data and technology as we see the future of...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Knobbe Martens Obtains Clean Sweep Of Six IPR Denials
Knobbe Martens, one of the leading intellectual property and technology law firms in the United States, has achieved a clean sweep of six Inter Partes Review (IPR) denials on behalf of its client,...
View ArticleLG Willfully Infringed Patent Covering “Plug & Play” Standard in Televisions
A New Jersey jury awarded Mondis $45 million in patent damages, based on LG’s sales of infringing televisions that support the “Plug & Play” standard. The “Plug & Play” standard was...
View ArticleATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC v. IANCU
Before Newman, O’Malley, and Wallach. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.Summary: Diligence requires “reasonably continuous diligence” and is not negated if the inventor works on...
View ArticleOMEGA PATENTS, LLC v. CALAMP CORP.
Before Prost, Dyk, and Wallach. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.Summary: Asserting the district court’s claim construction prevented consideration of...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Show Wang
Attorney User show.wang@knobbe.comEducation New York University School of Law 2014 J.D.Biomedical EngineeringDuke University 2009 B.S.E.EconomicsDuke University 2009 B.S.Telephone 212-849-3000Office...
View ArticleCHARGEPOINT, INC. v. SEMACONNECT, INC.
Before Prost, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.Summary: An abstract idea cannot be used to supply an inventive concept that renders a claim...
View ArticleARCTIC CAT INC. v. GEP POWER PRODUCTS, INC.
Federal Circuit Summary Before Prost, Reyna, Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.Summary: Where the preamble of a claim merely identifies an intended use and does not impose a...
View ArticlePERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. APPLE, INC.
Federal Circuit Summary Before Moore, Taranto, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.Summary: The mere fact that a certain thing may result from a given set of circumstances is not...
View Article
![[imports/adg/photos/213899875_Police-Car-Lights-2.jpg]](http://wehco.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com/imports/adg/photos/213899875_Police-Car-Lights-2_t600.jpg?4326734cdb8e39baa3579048ef63ad7b451e7676)
![Suupeas – Fall in Dream (2026-10-09) [Single, FLAC 24bit/48kHz]](http://getimg.link/images/2026/10/17/442240.md.jpg)